14 Aug 2017 00:50, Ward Dossche wrote to Benny Pedersen:
WD> Benny,
BP>> do you know why i report it ?, the dupe dailylst.225 was by htick BP>> renamed to dailylst.226, what happens next day then ?
BP>> rethink it !
WD> Get in touch with HTICK developers and ask for a bug-fix.
doh, you completely ignore me would be better, there is ONLY one way htick developers can solve this, and that by search for md5 sum finding the renamed file, and rename it again from the tic filename to get it back to original, its not completely impossible, but its a problem with linux world, and how incomming dupes are in inbound that is ignore from uplinks pow, my own rule would make it possible to hatch dailylst daily, but if more then daily is needed use a static filename that have no day number
i just say its a problem uplinks creates, that is not solved by uplinks, so why should i be better then that ?
Regards Benny
... there can only be one way of life, and it works :)
--- Msged/LNX 6.2.0 (Linux/4.12.6-gentoo (i686)) * Origin: openvpn on its way here (2:230/0)
