= Сообщение: 5379 из 12527 ====================================== ENET.SYSOP = От : Benny Pedersen 2:230/0 09 Sep 17 16:18:48 Кому : Michiel van der Vlist 09 Sep 17 16:18:48 Тема : IPv6 FGHI : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:230/0+59b4157d На : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:280/5555+59b3e97f = Кодировка сообщения определена как: LATIN1 ================================= Ответ: area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:280/5555+59b4039d ============================================================================== Hello Michiel!
09 Sep 2017 15:09, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Benny Pedersen:
MvdV> Hello Benny,
MvdV> On Saturday September 09 2017 14:16, you wrote to me:
BP>> my underlaying question is will ipv10 bring more or less fidonet nodes BP>> ?
MvdV> Nes.
if ipv10 will be a succes you can connect from ipv6 to my ipv4 hostname, so no one need to know more why its cool
or not :)
BP>> 56 ipv6 nodes out of number of nodes in nodelist is compared little % BP>> wise number
MvdV> The number of IPv6 nodes will grow and the total number of nodes MvdV> will decrease, so the percentage will rise even faster. Also keep in MvdV> mind that the nodes in the IPv6 list are all active nodes. So if you MvdV> look at the active nodes, the percentage is even larger.
MvdV> Like it or not, IPv6 is the future.
yep, sadly most danish isps dont give a shit about that, since nat is so good implementatet on missing ipv4, thats also why i dont think android modem dialers is not the future unless its tcp based
BP>> i only care of emsi works or not, not how one connects, i can still BP>> make inbound better then today, both with or without ipv6 and ipv10 on BP>> my linux fidonet host, thanks to binkp/emsi its super simple to BP>> haproxy it or more linux/unix wise xinetd redirect connection, i think BP>> a openwrt router knows it better then me :=)
