Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции ENET.SYSOP
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции ENET.SYSOP с датами от 10 Jul 13 21:42:12 до 04 Oct 24 12:06:02, всего сообщений: 12556
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 2304 из 12556 ====================================== ENET.SYSOP =
От   : Markus Reschke                   2:240/1661         22 Apr 15 18:54:04
Кому : Benny Pedersen                                      22 Apr 15 18:54:04
Тема : routed netmail file requests :/
FGHI : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:240/1661+5533e9a1
На   : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:230/0+5536d288
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: LATIN-1 ================================
==============================================================================
Hi Benny!

Apr 21 22:40 2015, Benny Pedersen wrote to Markus Reschke:

MR>> I wonder how you get control files for that address.

BP> hpt create it from an imho invalid pkt file to proxy filereq from
BP> here, dont know if it was planned to send it back to requester, but
BP> lets see if i can safely do a netmail to 2:65535/65535 without errors
BP> :=)

BP> invalid 2d route ?

If I got it right, 65535 is -1, since the 16 bit address value is signed. The valid range for the net number is 1 - 32767 and for the node number it's -1 - 32767. -1 is a special case for node number requests. Therefore 2:-1/-1 is an invalid address. 2:240/-1 would fine for someone requesting his first node number in 2:240, but not for a nodelist entry.

And what I would like to know is why the hell address values are signed. I know tons of communication protocols and Fido is the only one using signed address values. It's simply wrong.

Regards,
Markus

---
* Origin: *** theca tabellaria *** (2:240/1661)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.091356 секунды