16.02.2018 12:14, Michiel van der Vlist schrieb an Wilfred van Velzen:
WV>> But also netmail the report directly to the C's involved... MV> NlCheck was designed as a tool for *Cs as an addendum to MakeNl and MV> ErrFlags. It flags missing contact info and optionally adds the Pvt MV> keyword. When run by an RC or ZC, sending back reports to the next MV> lower *Cs submitting segments is not difficult, but it was not really MV> designed to be run by a third party. So what you propose would require MV> a major rewrite. I am not sure that would be worth the time and MV> effort... Well, I modified nlcheck to inform the Hosts/Hubs of my network, if anything is wrong. But, as a tiny RC it's not your or mine job, to inform other RC's about errors in their segment. A zone wide checking and information is the responsibility of the zone coord. My point of view.
