= Сообщение: 6336 из 12549 ====================================== ENET.SYSOP = От : Robert Bashe 2:2448/44 03 May 18 13:55:18 Кому : Markus Reschke 03 May 18 13:55:18 Тема : GDPR FGHI : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:2448/44+5aeafa5b На : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:240/1661+5ae9a18e = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ================================== Ответ: area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:240/1661+5ae9a191 ============================================================================== Markus Reschke wrote to Michiel van der Vlist on Thursday May 03 2018 at 10:57:
MR> It's a mess. And I don't see any way we could comply. The *C would be MR> responsible for all nodes but has no control about what each node MR> collects and how long that will be stored. There are also requirements MR> for providing all stored data about a person on request, also MR> correction and deletion of personal data. So the *C would have to ask MR> all nodes to send him all personal data about a specific person. That MR> wouldn't work reliably.
Seems to me we had quite a discussion a long time ago about this topic. Mail movers are not allowed to read messages passing through their systems. That is, as far as I know, the status quo. And would seem to be in agreement with any halfway reasonable privacy law that could be invoked.
If mail movers are no longer allowed to "move mail" for fear that the origin and destination are known (how would you avoid that?), that would be the end of fido. Do you see any alternative?
However, I think it will be quite a few years before the powers-that-be realize that fido even exists, much less try to regulate it. Most outsiders probably don't even know what's involved. So I, for one, am not worried too much about the future. The present is worrying enough.
