FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции ENET.SYSOP
Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции ENET.SYSOP с датами от 10 Jul 13 21:42:12 до 04 Oct 24 12:06:02, всего сообщений: 12556
= Сообщение: 2301 из 12556 ====================================== ENET.SYSOP =
От : Kees van Eeten 2:280/5003.4 20 Apr 15 20:30:38
Кому : Torsten Bamberg 20 Apr 15 20:30:38
Тема : Expired dynamic dns services
FGHI : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:280/5003.4+55355425
На : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:24/0+544c3443
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: LATIN-1 ================================
==============================================================================
Hello Torsten!
It took some time to proove my case.
TB> currently some nodes in R24 are temporarly down:
KvE>> 2:240/4014 bagge.dyndns.org NXDOMAIN
KvE>> 2:2432/223 donnerhain.dyndns.org NXDOMAIN
KvE>> 2:2432/260 oal-fido.no-ip.org NXDOMAIN
KvE>> 2:2432/363 dance-system.dyndns.org NXDOMAIN
KvE>> 2:2433/404 wing-willich.dyndns.org NXDOMAIN
KvE>> 2:2449/7 ideefix.dyndns.org NXDOMAIN
The query to resolve the dns hostnames is now repeated during 152 consecutive
days, ending today. What is your definition of temporarily?
152 # 2:240/4014@fidonet bagge.dyndns.org NXDOMAIN
152 # 2:240/6298@fidonet fido.crashmail.de NXDOMAIN
152 # 2:2432/223@fidonet donnerhain.dyndns.org NXDOMAIN
152 # 2:2432/260@fidonet oal-fido.no-ip.org NXDOMAIN
152 # 2:2432/363@fidonet dance-system.dyndns.org NXDOMAIN
152 # 2:2433/404@fidonet wing-willich.dyndns.org NXDOMAIN
152 # 2:2437/1@fidonet travelbit.spdns.org NXDOMAIN
152 # 2:2449/7@fidonet ideefix.dyndns.org NXDOMAIN
152 # 2:246/1020@fidonet joschi1.nsupdate.info NXDOMAIN
TB> Online on Sundays:
KvE>> 2:2476/159 flyerbbs.dyndns.org NXDOMAIN
I presume only during ZMH? How can that be accomplished?
152 # 2:2476/159@fidonet flyerbbs.dyndns.org NXDOMAIN
While you are at it:
2:240/3002 was first marked Down in nodelist 2014/199
2:2432/215 2014/129
2:2432/216 2014/129
2:2432/217 2014/129
2:2432/280 2014/129
2:2437/33 2013/347
2:2437/34 2013/347
2:2452/300 2014/199
Shouldn't these nodes have been removed by now?
2:2449/170 was first marked Hold in nodelist 2005/091
2:2449/175 2005/091
2:2449/179 2005/091
Is it realistic for a node to be listed as "Hold" for 10 years when the
nodelist indicates that de node supports BINKD and presents a DNS hostname.
Kees
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
* Origin: As for me, all I know is that, I know nothing. (2:280/5003.4)
|
К главной странице гейта
| 
