Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции ENET.SYSOP
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции ENET.SYSOP с датами от 10 Jul 13 21:42:12 до 28 Jun 24 12:04:28, всего сообщений: 12519
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 2852 из 12519 ====================================== ENET.SYSOP =
От   : Kees van Eeten                   2:280/5003.4       28 Sep 15 23:57:58
Кому : BjЎrn Felten                                        28 Sep 15 23:57:58
Тема : More about nodelists
FGHI : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:280/5003.4+5609b952
На   : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:203/2+5607e38c
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: LATIN-1 ================================
Ответ: area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:280/5003.4+5609bb59
==============================================================================
Hello BjЎrn!

27 Sep 15 14:39, you wrote to you:

BF>>     E.g. I got two (at least, I guess a third one was properly
BF>> processed) TIC files a couple of weeks ago:

BF>    What I think happened here (haven't bothered to unpack the log files
BF> here) is the following:

BF>    1. I got the .TIC and the file. It processed properly, including moving
BF> the file from the inbound to the proper file area.

BF>    2. 40 seconds(?) later I got a second .TIC and file combo. Since the
BF> file had the same CRC it was classified as a dupe. The .TIC was renamed to
BF> .BAD and the file was never moved.

BF>    3. Another 40 seconds later I got a third copy of the combo. Since the
BF> file was already in my inbound my mailer rejected the file itself. Still a
BF> dupe so this .TIC was also renamed .BAD.

BF>    Just my two cents...

 According to my logs,
 the only day in recent history where 3 Nodelists were distributed is:

- 05 Sep 00:40:11 [10848] receiving NODELIST.248 (230994 byte(s), off 0)
- 05 Sep 02:24:39 [32162] receiving NODELIST.248 (230986 byte(s), off 0)
- 05 Sep 13:17:20 [31361] receiving NODELIST.248 (230978 byte(s), off 0)

According to the size, all three were different.

 If the transmissions were within 40 secs, could it be that the first
 transmission failed?.

 Over the period fro 25 Aug 2015 - 28 Sep 2015 I cannot find any log entries,
 where a second nodelist, with the same name and size was received.

 Maybe you should bother to unpack your logfiles.

Kees

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
* Origin: As for me, all I know is that, I know nothing. (2:280/5003.4)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.060338 секунды