Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции ENET.SYSOP
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции ENET.SYSOP с датами от 10 Jul 13 21:42:12 до 14 Jun 24 12:02:39, всего сообщений: 12513
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 7441 из 12513 ====================================== ENET.SYSOP =
От   : Kees van Eeten                   2:280/5003.4       21 Sep 18 11:39:44
Кому : Michiel van der Vlist                               21 Sep 18 11:39:44
Тема : Nlcheck report
FGHI : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:280/5003.4+5ba4c5fe
На   : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:280/5555+5ba4b35f
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: LATIN1 =================================
Ответ: area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:280/5555+5ba62749
==============================================================================
Hello Michiel!

21 Sep 18 10:40, you wrote to Benny Pedersen:

MvdV> When "Allowunpub" was introduced, MakeNl should have been equipped with
MvdV> a check for missing IP connect info and force "Pvt" if both the
MvdV> telephone number and IP info are absent. And refuse the entry in case of
MvdV> a Hub, Host, Region or Zone entry without connect info.

 You cannot drop an entry with a Hub, Host, Region or Zone entry. If you do
 the hole segment has to be dropped.

 You cannot replace a Hub, Host, Region, Zone tag by Pvt for the same reason,
 as the following lines will be added to the foregoing segment.

 I have not checked with makenl, but what does it do without Allowunpub,
 when a Host line contains -Unpublished- ?

 I agree, that makenl was crippled in it's checks to allow for a changing
 needs. Crippling the checks in makenl was easy, getting consenus on new
 limits of what was allowable was not, or not tried. Common sense by those
 who edit the segments, was expected to be enough.

 The problem is, that common sense is not common.

 As for what makenl should check and what makenl should not check, be aware
 that as far as makenl is concerned, a nodelist line ends with the modem speed
 value. Makenl has no knowlede of flags.

 You may claim, that including the flags in tests is peanuts, as you have done
 it in your util, including such rules in makenl, could be a major effort.

 And if done, will the main users of makenl then accept such changes to that
 program.

 Another thing would be to make the use of a pre/post filter programm
 mandatory. History has show, that introducing such a programm fidonet wide
 is next to impossible, but you are welcome to try.

Kees

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
* Origin: As for me, all I know is that, I know nothing. (2:280/5003.4)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.123018 секунды