= Сообщение: 2870 из 12519 ====================================== ENET.SYSOP = От : Michiel van der Vlist 2:280/5555 29 Sep 15 18:41:21 Кому : Björn Felten 29 Sep 15 18:41:21 Тема : The DAILYLST FGHI : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:280/5555+560ac12d На : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:203/2+560a9690 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP850 ================================== Ответ: area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:203/2+560acd4a ============================================================================== Hello Björn,
On Tuesday September 29 2015 14:48, you wrote to me:
MvdV>> It is current practise. It is as Ward says, the possibility to MvdV>> have more than one update a day has been open from the very MvdV>> beginning of the project and it has in fact been done a few MvdV>> times.
BF> Come to think of it, not fair enough.
Ittook you less than half an hour to change your mind?
BF> I have absolutely no recollection of this being discussed. How many BF> of the rest of my RC colleagues remember that discussion?
The human memory is notoriously unrelable and it does not get better with age. That you do not remember it does not mean it did not happen.
BF> I don't know about your book, but mine says that daily means once BF> per 24h.
That is just one of the meanings. It can also mean something that happenes every day, but not necessarily just once. Thare are more meanings.
What happened to you? Did Roy's ghost take posession of you? You playing semantics sure make it sound that way... :-(
MvdV>> and the dailyutf. I wonder why you call it a bad idea now, IIRC MvdV>> you were among those suggesting this possibility.
BF> Yes, a daily list that was produced exactly the same way as the BF> regular diff and file, and at the exact same time of the day, only BF> seven rather than one times a week.
NJo. the possibility to issue more than one a day was announced from the very beginning.
MvdV>> A decent file processor should have no problems with it. Mine MvdV>> doesn't.
BF> Don't give me that crap! I never said I had problems with it.
Than what are you moaning about?
BF> What I'm starting to understand is what Benny has been reporting BF> for years now, and we all tried to make it look like it was his system BF> that was in error. Just as you now are trying to make it look like BF> it's my system that is not functioning properly.
Those are your words. All I said is that a decent file processor should have no problems with it. I did not say you did not have a decent frile processor.
BF> Sorry, Benny, I now know what you've been trying to say all the BF> time.
I can only report that *I* never had problems with Ward's files. Except for the time he was in Montana and his system crashed.
