= Сообщение: 3870 из 12549 ====================================== ENET.SYSOP = От : Michiel van der Vlist 2:280/5555 22 Jun 16 13:47:26 Кому : Gerrit Kuehn 22 Jun 16 13:47:26 Тема : Brexit FGHI : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:280/5555+576a7eb7 На : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:240/12+574b4012 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP850 ================================== Ответ: area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:240/12+574b4015 ============================================================================== Hello Gerrit,
On Monday June 20 2016 19:52, you wrote to me:
MvdV>> Perhaps. But within that "New Union" there would still be net MvdV>> contributors and net receivers. Or "leeches" in your words. MvdV>> What will be the next step? Should we do another round and kick MvdV>> out the new "leeches"?
GK> This is obviously not the way to go.
Obviously. I was taking it to the extreme to demonstrate the fallacy of the argument.
GK> Interestingly, here the southern states tend to pay for the northen GK> ones. Of course this system if often debated, but it works.
Whatever the system is, there will always be regions that are net contributors and there will be regions that are net receivers. We have something similiar here in The Netherlands. The Northern Provinces are net receivers. The "Randstad" (North & South Holland and Utrecht) are net contributors. No one suggests the Randstad should leave The Netherlands. The reason is of course that in our hearths and minds are with the country and not so much with the provinces.
What I find interesting is that tomorrow the people of the UK decide if they want in or out of the EU. But no one asks the rest of the EU what they want. If there were a referendum tomorrow here in The Netherlands with the question: "do we allow the UK to remain or do we kick them out", I might vote for "kick them out".