= Сообщение: 2153 из 12549 ====================================== ENET.SYSOP = От : Oleg Pevzner 2:46/50 25 Feb 15 23:49:12 Кому : All 25 Feb 15 23:49:12 Тема : Re: File requesting with binkd FGHI : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:46/50+54ee450b = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP1125 ================================= Ответ: area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:280/464+54ef1a9a ============================================================================== * Forwarded from ECHOLOOPS by Oleg Pevzner (2:46/50). * Originally by: Wilfred van Velzen (2:280/464), 25 Feb 15 22:26. * Originally to: Michiel van der Vlist.
Pkt from : 1:123/500 Original pkt from : 2:221/1 PATH : 280/464 154/10 123/500 Original PATH : 280/464 203/0 221/1 Msg arrived : Wed Feb 25 23:40:04 2015 Original msg arrived : Wed Feb 25 23:40:04 2015 @AREA:BINKD Hi,
On 2015-02-25 21:26:37, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Wilfred van Velzen: about: "File requesting with binkd":
WV>> I think you don't want to create incompatibilities between different WV>> BSO mailers, they should all act the same,
MvdV> That is why the proposed autosendreq should be a configurable option...
Agreed.
But is there a real need for this new behaviour, even if it's more logical?
Current utilities that create .req files don't need it. They all do it the current way (otherwise it wouldn't work). It's only a little bit more convenient if you are creating .req files by hand, because you don't have to also create a .?lo file...
