Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции ENET.SYSOP
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции ENET.SYSOP с датами от 10 Jul 13 21:42:12 до 28 Jun 24 12:04:28, всего сообщений: 12519
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 2833 из 12519 ====================================== ENET.SYSOP =
От   : Oleg Pevzner                     2:464/5555         27 Sep 15 14:15:56
Кому : Ward Dossche                                        27 Sep 15 14:15:56
Тема : More about nodelists
FGHI : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:464/5555+5607d0ab
На   : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:292/854+a4081482
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ==================================
Ответ: area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:292/854+a1016170
==============================================================================
Hello Ward!

Saturday September 26 2015 22:43, you wrote to me:

WD> I think you and/or who claims this is gravely mistaken until you can
WD> more adequately prove your statement.

[...skipped...]

WD> Please let me know because my nodelist-watchdogs Wilfred Van Velzen
WD> and Kees Van Eeten have not contacted me at all about this.

   Thank you for the explanation. I'm not ready to describe the issue more substantively, because this error was noticed much earlier. It happened that in summer, just during your long-lasting absence, when Kees van Eeten was making the nodelists instead of you, the two old networks were recovered, and we had to work with the nodelist actively. Kees himself is worth just great thanks for his work and his help, he has done a lot of useful then. However, it was observed that the segments which were sent for processing appeared at the FTP almost immediately, while they were unavailable at the fecho during several days. Moreover, usually they became available only after the personal contacts with Kees which also was not easy then. Remembering that, I've written about this issue in the echo. If the problem doesn't exist in real, I will be only glad. But I would like to ask you not to ignore it but to check more precisely whether the fecho and the FTP are synchronized between each other qualitatively. Nothing critical but a wish. Thanks.

WBR, Oleg                           Sunday September 27 2015
E-Mail: omp<no-spam>omp.dp.ua

--- XStation
* Origin:  (2:464/5555)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.072113 секунды