= Сообщение: 5473 из 12525 ====================================== ENET.SYSOP = От : Michael Dukelsky 2:5020/1042 16 Sep 17 13:09:24 Кому : Kai Richter 16 Sep 17 13:09:24 Тема : ERRFLAGS.ZC2 FGHI : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:5020/1042+59bcfc71 На : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:240/77+59bc541e = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ================================== ============================================================================== Hallo Kai!
Am Sep 16 2017 hat Kai Richter an Michael Dukelsky geschrieben:
MV>>> We already have the Pvt keyword to signal the inability to MV>>> accept incoming connections.
MD>> You are right. But if one takes such nodes as regular ones as MD>> Ward wants it then we must admit that the Pvt keyword is in the MD>> wrong place. It is better to make Pvt a flag among other MD>> connectivity flags.
KR> Maybe but i agree with Michiel. The actual PVT is already known by KR> many systems and there is no difference in workflow control. PVT or KR> U,PVT means do not call this node. Do not shock the fidonet with work KR> for nothing.
If we leave Pvt as it is now then the only real use for MOB flag may be a workaround of "2.1.9 Private Nodes" in Fidonet Policy. Whether we need it is a different question.
