= Сообщение: 1145 из 12549 ====================================== ENET.SYSOP = От : Alexey Vissarionov 2:5020/545 02 Oct 14 13:37:22 Кому : Kees van Eeten 02 Oct 14 13:37:22 Тема : Host names not resolving FGHI : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:5020/545+542d1d79 На : area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:280/5003.4+542c7acd = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ================================== Ответ: area://ENET.SYSOP?msgid=2:280/5003.4+542dc21d ============================================================================== Good ${greeting_time}, Kees!
01 Oct 2014 23:57:08, you wrote to Benny Pedersen:
KvE>>> Please be aware that the following hostnames do not resolve to an KvE>>> IPaddress. BP>> [snip] KvE>>> These hostnames should either be removed from the Nodelist, or KvE>>> relevant data has to be added to the binkp.net DNS service. BP>> yes that is the risk of cname references KE> binkp.net only consists of cname references where there is a hostname KE> in the nodelist. Where binkp.net hostnames are entered in the KE> nodelist, fixed entries are made into the domain. Apparently they KE> were removed or expired trough some mechanism.
1. Not only 2. FTS-5004 explicitly prohibits publishing these hostnames in the nodelist:
If the INA flag (or any of the protocol flags) of any node carries host name built from the FTN address using DDN or any other method, that node MUST be skipped and MUST NOT appear in resulting NS zone. In general, such names SHOULD NOT appear in the nodelist.
KvE>>> Just an observation. BP>> what will happend in qico/binkp for nxdomains ? KE> Nothing, the hostnames do not resolve to an IP address, so the mail KE> will remain undelivered.
Loss of connectivity, nothing else...
-- Alexey V. Vissarionov aka Gremlin from Kremlin gremlin.ru!gremlin; +vii-cmiii-ccxxix-lxxix-xlii
