= Сообщение: 6195 из 7128 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : James Coyle 1:129/215 01 Mar 22 17:53:33 Кому : Rob Swindell 01 Mar 22 17:53:33 Тема : Re: Re^2: Re^4: Directly include binary data in messages FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:129/215+7337cfcd На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=31653.ftsc_pub@1:103/705+26834a89 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ================================== Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=31663.ftsc_pub@1:103/705+26848b43 ============================================================================== RS> That's the case I was trying to make (along with all the other "prior RS> art" of insecure Internet protocols that have an alternate/secure port RS> for implicit TLS connections, e.g. telnets) - but they weren't buying it.
Sounds like you gave them really the only legs we had to stand on and it failed. Thats a shame, but at least we know.
RS> Yeah, we should do that. :-) I have a number of STARTTLS implementations RS> in Synchronet already (e.g. SMTPS, FTPS), so I don't expect it'd be much RS> different, thought I suppose this would be the first one I'd do in RS> JavaScript (since BinkIT is written in JS).
Yep it shouldn't be too difficult. I also have it working for some protocols like POP3/SMTP in Mystic. I don't think my FTP does it though so maybe I can look into that after this since it'd also probably benefit DoveNet security.
I have a document with an outline and some requirements/notes for TLS BINKP that I can e-mail you. It might save us a little time not having to reinvent the entire wheel, assuming you think its usable of course :)
Maybe once we agree on what we want to do and have it working then we can clean it up and circulate it or make a proposal or whatever?
Is there a preferred e-mail you like to use? Or I could Netmail whatever works best.
... The person who snores the loudest will fall asleep first
