RS> I guess you don't know what "backwards compatible" means.
I guess the same about you.
RS> Backwards compatible means it would continue to work with RS> existing systems.
I swear that is known simply as compatibilty. Backwards implies the past. However in both cases it is obvious the software we're using is {,backwards} compatible given our exchanges.
RS> I suspect most other echomail programs would do the same.
Mine as well. However mine can quicky adapt to a much needed change in order to facillitate progress especially when it concerns an obviously needed fix. Your proposal doesn't allow for a proper fix and solves nothing. Mine does and is therefore superior as well as much needed.
RS> Is this how you normally engage in technical discussions?
I thought it was obvious that I don't normally engage in technical discussions. Regarding this one I believe I am 100% correct and you are 100% wrong.
Life is good, Maurice
... Se forholena cræft and forhyded gold ne bið ællunga ungelice. Concealed skill and hidden gold are not entirely unalike. --- GNU bash, version 5.1.0(1)-release (x86_64-motorshed-linux-gnu) * Origin: Little Mikey's Brain - Ladysmith BC, Canada (1:153/7001)
