On Sat Feb 06 2021 14:19:12, Carol Shenkenberger wrote to August Abolins:
CS> There hasn't been much going on be a couple of us have been helping CS> folks understand how the standards got in place and how proposals CS> work.
That has nothing to do with the FTSC.
CS> There are 2 in possible view in the not too distant future. One from CS> Maurice on datestamps that may morf a bit to become msg-id area (not CS> clear to me on where he's taking it but he's looking at the next Y2K
Nothing has been drafted. Maybe another proposal, but can not be turned into a standard for another million years.
CS> type event) and you and Stas with Telegram working off CS> smartphone/Notepads (assume I got that right).
Again, something has to be drafted, and in this case.. can it be? Another protocol/service is being used to "gate" into Fidonet.
CS> Ozz has been developing a BBS with embedded mailer/tosser from what I CS> can tell.
Based off current standards and proposals, more than likely. If anything new is made, show the FTSC so they can document it.
CS> and Nick is new enough, nothing has really happened but he devlops a CS> major mailer.
Nick as in Nick Andre? New Enough? Do you live in space?
CS> I have one other thought. If no one screams too hard, maybe we can CS> mix the renewal election dates a bit so it's not so lop-sided? Just CS> adjust some to further out. We've done that before. Twice that I CS> know of.
We basically have to support what's left, because by definition if we don't have 7? members, the FTSC is null and void.
Regards, Nick
... "Take my advice, I don't use it anyway." --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20181215 * Origin: thePharcyde_ distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)
