= Сообщение: 1381 из 7127 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Nicholas Boel 1:154/701 20 Oct 14 16:29:48 Кому : Paul Quinn 20 Oct 14 16:29:48 Тема : Re: FTSC-5001 question FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:154/701+54457f74 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=3:640/1384+54444162 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: UTF-8 ================================== ============================================================================== Hello Paul,
On 20 Oct 14 08:55, Paul Quinn wrote to Nicholas Boel:
PQ> Hi! Nick,
PQ> On 10/20/2014 07:20 AM, you wrote:
AL>>> The best thing to do is have Argus answer telnet on an alternate AL>>> port such as 60177. Then just list it in the nodelist as AL>>> ITN:60177. That way BBS callers on port 23 get right to the BBS AL>>> and mail can still come in via telnet at the same time. I run AL>>> MBSE this way and it works fine.
NB>> That's exactly what I was asking and the direction I was going NB>> with what I had posted. Thank you for the confirmation on that!
PQ> Bad logic IMHO. MBSE is handicapped. It is a BBS, with mailer PQ> functions. My shortcoming now: I _think_ that ports specified in PQ> MBSE's config cannot be re-used between BBS & mailer functions.
I think it's more in the sense of BBS softwares that run a telnet server on port 23. It's apparant (since you've said so) that you can run Argus as your frontend, and not run a BBS telnet server.. but some people prefer to run the BBS's telnet server and use Argus aside from that. In that case, you would have to run the mailer's telnet server on another port - which is the direction I was originally going with it as well as Andrew.
