= Сообщение: 6357 из 7128 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Shaun Buzza 1:229/110 13 Mar 22 08:25:32 Кому : Ward Dossche 13 Mar 22 08:25:32 Тема : Re: 2022 FTSC Standing Member Election - Votes Received FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:229/110+71f3629d На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:292/854+102c463a = Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ================================== Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:292/854+161b334d ============================================================================== WD> SB> I have no idea! But, as an outside observer, I can clearly see that yo WD> SB> are trying your level best to influence this proceeding. And that is WD> SB> exactly why I am wondering... WD> WD> Wipe-off your spectacles then ... WD> WD> This is the current composition of the FTSC with Deon George vacating his WD> seat... WD> WD> Name Node Term ends WD> -------------------------------------------------------- WD> Andrew Leary 1:320/219 29 Mar 2023 WD> mark lewis 1:3634/12 29 Mar 2023 WD> Richard Menedetter 2:310/31 29 Mar 2023 WD> Carol Shenkenberger 1:275/100 29 Mar 2023 WD> Nick Andre 1:229/426 29 Mar 2023 WD> Deon George 3:633/509 06 Jan 2022 WD> Maurice Kinal 1:153/7001 29 Mar 2023 WD> Dale Barnes 1:106/201 29 Mar 2023 WD> WD> 7 remaining ... without the names put forward by the ZCC Nominating WD> Committee there would be an empty election. Meaning if the ZCC doesn't WD> move next year those 7 mandates will also expire ... that would mean the WD> end of the FTSC according to its charter. WD> WD> Yes, of course, the minumum required number can be lowered and there may WD> be a few nominations just to fullfill that minimum requirement but I WD> doubt if people like Nick Andre, Andrew Leary, Dale Barnes ... can be WD> motivated for another term of '2 years nothing' which in fact would make WD> the complete concept of an FTSC useless.
Thank you for bringing me further insight into the internal mechanisms of the FTSC. I really do appreciate having someone provide me with much-needed knowledge.
To be clear, I was not referencing your use of the ZCC nomination clause. I agree, there wouldn't be enough candidates (especially after the first one withdrew) if you hadn't done that.
I was commenting about what is visible to the 'public', in this echo, after that nomination. After all, this is the only source of current information upon which to make a choice about a current election.
WD> You should not be questioning me for my motives to keep the FTSC as a WD> functional body, instead you should be questioning all the RCs (minus Jay WD> Harris) why they are sitting on their asses and not thinking about the WD> continuity ... WD> WD> 2 weeks into the voting period of 3 weeks with the ballot closing like 7 WD> days from now, Andrew recorded 16 votes out of 34 RCs listed. Isn't that WD> worrysome? Some will still roll-in, but nevertheless ...
I agree with you once again on this point. It is a little discouraging to see apathy from the very people for which this election matters. But, this isn't exactly fresh news. It happens in real life, too, where voter numbers aren't anywhere close to maximum.
WD> SB>WD> Remember, I do not run this election ... I'm an "interrested WD> SB>WD> bystander". WD> WD> SB> A little *too* interested, in my opinion... WD> WD> "Daddy, what did you do during the war?"
Um...what? (o_O) I'm Gen X. My daddy was a letter in someone's pocket during The War. Oh, wait...which war did you mean? There's so many, these days! (o_O)
WD> SB> I really think this particular discussion should take place via Netmai WD> SB> as I suggested. This is definitely straying far off the topic that I h WD> SB> brought up. WD> WD> Not my monkey, not my circus. You started this. Write echomail, I will WD> reply in echomail. Write netmail and ...
Okay, but does that mean there is a monkey and circus that ARE yours? Somehow, I feel like you would make a great clown! (o_-)
I also feel like some would say the same about me, but that *is* my monkey, my circus, and not yours.
Okay, McDoob...time for bed...you've had enough...
