Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC с датами от 13 Sep 13 18:57:24 до 15 Nov 24 00:30:01, всего сообщений: 7128
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 6291 из 7128 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC =
От   : Shaun Buzza                      1:229/110          10 Mar 22 20:22:05
Кому : Ward Dossche                                        10 Mar 22 20:22:05
Тема : Re: 2022 FTSC Standing Member Election - Votes Received
FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:229/110+e4b84986
На   : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:292/854+1c173445
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ==================================
==============================================================================
WD> RTFM ... in this case the election rules ...
WD>  
WD>    "Candidates must receive more "yes" than "no" votes to be elected."
WD>  
WD> So, from your POV 'not casting a vote' is an 'abstention' ?

Always as ascerbic as ever, Ward?

From my POV, 'not casting a vote' is not casting a vote. Casting a vote for any
one candidate, but not another, is an abstention of that other. It is
unreasonable to assign abstentions when someone simply isn't taking part, and
these should *not* be counted toward the total number of votes. However,
abstentions, where it is clear that a voter is abstaining, *should* be
counted and should have an impact. Otherwise, what's the point of even
including it as an option?

Now, if you don't mind, I'd like to hear from the person who is actually
running this election, rather than the one who only thinks he is. Good day,
sir.

McDoob
SysOp, PiBBS
pibbs.sytes.net

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: PiBBS (1:229/110)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.137070 секунды