DS> It is true. Both RC17 and RC14 cast their ballots with a no vote for DS> 2:203/2. Neither of them attempted to change that fact. There is not DS> any additional candidate mentioned, only the one listed at that node DS> number who was in the election.
PQ> You are mistaken. Look again. It's not hard to find both of BS's PQ> posts. PQ> Oh, alright. I will help you. There were eight (8) PQ> candidates. BS's vote named only seven (7). His re-vote PQ> named eight (8), finally. An implied abstain vote becomes PQ> a 'yes'? Strange, indeed.
PQ> Look and you will see.
I did look and you are right on that score, but it is not what all the discussion has been about. An apparent abstain was changed to a yes -- but isn't it strange that is not where the question is being made. Michiel counted the rest of Seaborn's vote, but I don't know whether he counted the abstain or the yes.