= Сообщение: 3571 из 7127 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Dale Shipp 1:261/1466 29 Dec 17 00:59:00 Кому : Ward Dossche 29 Dec 17 00:59:00 Тема : Re: Future Applications FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:261/1466.0+5a45d9a4 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:292/854+0d2c3a50 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ================================== Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:292/854+09344365 ============================================================================== -=> On 12-28-17 13:32, Ward Dossche <=- -=> spoke to Richard Menedetter about Re: Future Applications <=-
RM> Simply ... texts should be written in a way that is unambiguous. WD> WD> Well said.
Of course.
WD> WD> I am tired about this nonsense that I'm not a native WD> speaker so don't understand the language well enough.
What I was talking about was examples where it was quite clear that an item was optional, but someone insisted that people were not in compliance if they did not implement it. One example of several possible: the standards state what form a MSGID should take, but do not insist that one be present. Hence for someont to state that a system is not in compliance because they do not have a MSGID is not a matter of not being a native speaker, but simply one of attempting to impose their own bias.