>> I hadn't realized your conversation was meant to be private unless >> intimidation was meant to carried out :)
> Intimidation over 7-8-9,000 miles? On a keyboard?
If it quacks like a duck...
>C'mon Janis, be serious ... it's not as if I've ever put Fidonet-participation > on a resume. It's so irrelevant, as is demonstrated by this 'conversation'.
> Maybe I need to add a new law to my already set of existing laws:
>"Any statement made on an on-line public forum will after no more than 5 cycle > turn into a verbal fight".
No, the law would be more like, "Publically Made Silly statements will bring a response in Public Echos" <grin>
