> Apparently it is more important to elect all proposed candidates of whom > everybody is happy that they step forward and have their candidacy > unchallenged, are elected in a flawless procedure.
No, what's important is that the one who runs the election is probably not the ftsc chair, and one who can give his attention to the detail the election deserves. So that the procedures can be followed.
> Just an annoyed member of Fidonet.
I'm sorry you're annoyed, I didn't mean to piss you off Kees. What I would like to see though is someone rewrite the document where the election procedure is detailed, and then have the FTSC actually follow that document if it's accepted. Anyone can write an ftsc document, afterall, IIRC.
