Sunday December 21 2014 14:59, mark lewis wrote to Nicholas Boel:
NB>> Looks like about 8 documents were revised and/or created in the NB>> past week, while not one was mentioned or brought up for NB>> discussion in this echo.
ml> they're not supposed to be are they? these are existing documents that ml> the FTSC has had on its table for a while...
NB>> What exactly is this echo intended for again?
ml> communication with the FTSC about technical matters...
ml> eg: ml> 1. developers wanting clarification on the implementation of ml> something. 2. corrections to published documents that may have been ml> missed. 3. public presentation of possible new proposals for ml> discussion.
NB>> Someone keeps forcing intention while calling everything else NB>> "off-topic", yet I fail to see anything happening that actually NB>> could be considered "on-topic" in here, either!
ml> i'm not sure i understand what you are trying to say here :/
NB>> Twice, I've asked for these revised/re-released or newly created NB>> documents to be posted in here (in text format) so that we NB>> actually have something to discuss, if we care to, in revelance NB>> to being "on-topic" per the moderator's rules. I seem to still be NB>> waiting for a response from the one who decides what is and is NB>> not "on-topic" in this echo, though. :(
ml> why not access the published ones and bring up your questions as noted ml> in example #1 or #2 above?
The newly released documents are often published in FidoNews as well.
