On Wed, 16 Apr 2014, Maurice Kinal wrote to Michiel van der Vlist:
MvdV> Same for other character sets like CP437, Latin 1 or ASCII.
MK> I beg to differ. I see all those and more. I don't see UTF-16 or MK> UTF-32 though but do see UTF-8 which doesn't require a BOM for MK> identification.
obviously something is required when your loved iconv tool tells you that this messages is UTF-8 just because it contains characters with positions >127 in the character table used to create this message...
your mФФsИ nЙЙds help and so do your tools which can't reliably identify a character set used in a message ;) O:)
yes, i know i didn't use all the same characters as you do with your moose but the point is still the same... the tool you use is not accurate in its identification...
)\/(ark
One of the great tragedies of life is the murder of a beautiful theory by a gang of brutal facts. --Benjamin Franklin
