= Сообщение: 1245 из 7128 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : mark lewis 1:3634/12.71 03 Oct 14 20:03:38 Кому : Michiel van der Vlist 03 Oct 14 20:03:38 Тема : FTSC-5001 question FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:3634/12.71+42f389f1 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/5555+542f05b8 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ================================== ============================================================================== On Fri, 03 Oct 2014, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to mark lewis:
ml> one case in point is a node which supports XA (Bark and WaZOO) with ml> one mailer and XW (WaZOO) with another mailer both running on the same ml> IP connection... how would one indicate XW for only the second mailer ml> while still indicating XA for the first mailer?
MvdV> This is a situation that was not foreseen when the flags were MvdV> created. It all originates from the POTS era when there was just MvdV> one mailer on-line on a telephone number.
yes...
MvdV> When I ran a dual capabilty system POTS+BINKP, I took a pragmatic MvdV> approach. I just listed the freq flag for the binkp system. I MvdV> figured the POTS system would get very few calls and nobody would MvdV> attempt to freq from it. It turned out I was right in that. I MvdV> have been runing POTS along binkp for almost a decade and I got MvdV> just 2 or 3 calls on tghe POTS line. No file requests.
the problem there is at least several-fold...
* my system does still get FREQs and FUPDs via both POTS and TELNET... * my system has quite a library of old hard to fine files... * SRIF can't do File UPDate requests...
there are more but i'm tired and it is friday night so i'm off...
thanks for confirming that it is an unworkable situation...
)\/(ark
If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur.
