= Сообщение: 1252 из 7128 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : mark lewis 1:3634/12.71 04 Oct 14 13:48:11 Кому : Alexey Vissarionov 04 Oct 14 13:48:11 Тема : FTSC-5001 question FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:3634/12.71+4302d4d2 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:5020/545+542fcf9f = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ================================== ==============================================================================
On Sat, 04 Oct 2014, Alexey Vissarionov wrote to mark lewis:
MvdV>> FTS-5000 and FTS-5001 do not mandate any particular order for MvdV>> the flags. ml> so where does that put multiple INA entries? does the last INA ml> apply to the entire entry or how is that supposed to work?
AV> All INA flags apply to the whole entry. And even more: addresses AV> listed in INA flags apply to all possible protocols.
highly disagreed... shows lack of vision...
AV> When a protocol is supported on a single address, then the AV> protocol flag MUST be used instead.
the whole idea behind the INA was to be able to shorten the nodelist lines... now you are saying that they should be extended further and still contain limitations...
AV> See the examples section of FTS-5004 for more suggestions of how AV> the protocol flags should be parsed.
those are simplistic examples...
)\/(ark
If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur.
