ml>> you might want to check with ward about that... he did piss all over ml>> the FIDO_SYSOP election process with this and other similar issues... ml>> none of them were against the rules there, either... it is strange ml>> that he isn't in here doing the same all over again...
WD> There is a difference:
WD> * In FIDO_SYSOP there was no proper rule handling this. It depended WD> purely on mood swings and the size of today's black spots on the sun;
many folks don't agree with you about that...
WD> * In the case of the FTSC the rules are very well formulated and deal WD> with the situation at hand
ummhummm...
WD> ... plus ...
WD> * In FIDO_SYSOP there was a lot of back-channel activity.
you don't think there's the same in this election, too? some would say that you are wrong about that, as well... there's always some sort of back-channel activity in any election... espcially when it comes to trying to add or remove others who do or don't view things the same way as others do...
WD> * In FTSC_PUBLIC it all is in the open
except for the back-channel comms...
)\/(ark
... The best cure for insomnia is to get a lot of sleep. --- * Origin: (1:3634/12.73)
