Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC с датами от 13 Sep 13 18:57:24 до 01 Aug 24 00:39:47, всего сообщений: 7127
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 666 из 7127 ======================================= FTSC_PUBLIC =
От   : Roy Witt                         1:387/22           30 Nov 13 11:36:22
Кому : Henri Derksen                                       30 Nov 13 11:36:22
Тема : Dispute from ZCC.
FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:387/22+529a2470
На   : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/1208@FidoNet+a68afc0c
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP437 ==================================
Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/1208@FidoNet+a9845996
==============================================================================
 Brer Henri Derksen wrote to Brer Region 18 Coordinator about Dispute from
ZCC.:

RC>> Host,203,West_Net,Sweden,Bjorn_Felten,46-31-960447,33600,CM,XA,V34,I
RC>> BN,INA:felt en.yi.org,U,NEC

RC>> Can you tell me or show me from the above which is your nodelist
RC>> segment where the names of those 87 registered users are? I do see
RC>> _YOUR_ name!!

HD> Did you notice there is no MO (=Mail Only) flag in his line?

Irrelevant.

HD> That means there is a BBS too!

Not really. The CM flag indicates that the node is in Continuous Mail
mode.

HD> A NodeNumber with a BBS means BBS-users with are adressed to as
HD> Point 0 (=Zero), ALL of them!

Reading that listing doesn't imply that any BBS is present. It has a modem
baud rate and a few modem flags, but nothing that says there is a BBS
there.

HD> And of course there are many (un)registered BBS-users.

Irrelevant.

HD> 2:203/2.0 could be any one of that BBS-users (SysOp included).

Also irrelevant.

HD> So a NodeNumber alone does not specify a certain person,

On the contrary. The nodelist was used as a reference for the elebibilty
of candidates with their names and node number to prove it. No BBS users
were included or allowed in the FTSC vote...

HD> and therefor can not be a valid indicator for a FTSC candidate!

Au contare'...

HD> Simple he?

Too simple, in fact so simple that it defys logic.

HD> As I am running UniCorn BBS with Users and Points for many decades,
HD> I know what I am talking about.

LOL! Sure you do.

HD> Here are many Point 0 (=Zero) BBSusers too. Note, they can also write
HD> and receive NetMail or EchoMail.

Irrelevant, as users and points aren't elegible as a candidate to the
FTSC.

HD> One votes only for or against a candidated human being (FidoNet
HD> participant) as a FTSC member, and not a nodelisted SysOp,

Wrong. You should get Michiel to explain this to you in Dutch, since
English  seems to go way over your head.

HD>  Point or (un-)registerd BBS-user by only a number, or a false name.

Irrelevant.

RC>> Your claim is as lame as the character set translation thing.

HD> My Point Zero proof shows your RC18 p.o.v. is hereby not valid for a
HD> complaint.

Neither is your non-compliant logic.


         R\%/itt - K5RXT

 Reminder: "On Friday September 8th 2006, Mike Godwin's 16 year experiment
 was concluded and Godwin's Law was officially repealed by a MAJORITY vote
 among millions of individuals." http://repealgodwin.tripod.com/

--- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-31012
--- D'Bridge 3.92
* Origin: Lone-Star Hub - Gulf Coast Distribution - USA (1:387/22)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.055989 секунды