= Сообщение: 5211 из 7128 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : mark lewis 1:3634/12 30 May 20 09:34:31 Кому : Wilfred van Velzen 30 May 20 09:34:31 Тема : Re: Nodelist Flags FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1501.fido-ftscpubl@1:3634/12+23379cc4 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/464+5ed22b0f = Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ================================== ============================================================================== Re: Re: Nodelist Flags By: Wilfred van Velzen to Paul Hayton on Sat May 30 2020 11:40:05
PH> I'm looking for ways to show a non standard telnet port or a ssh port PH> or... and yes it's for BBS connections.. a U flag could do this I PH> guess.. it's open for use in the FTSC specs..
WvV> But that doesn't mean you can put whatever you like in there.
sure it does... to a point... fidonet, however, has been having their eyes covered, though, by some who insist that all nodelist flags, U or not, are so-called approved or they will strip them... one day, folks will wake up and smell the roses and this so-called "approved U flags" nonsense will go out the window in the same way that folks found/figured out they could connect anywhere for their mail and didn't have to connect to some NC/NEC's or HUB's system for anything other than possibly routed netmail...
WvV> It should serve a purpose to the function of the nodelist. BBS WvV> connectivity for users doesn't qualify.
yeah... so listing (IC issued?) fakenets for BBSes with points didn't qualify? there were also serial numbers of some sort listed in old nodelists... i know there were other things listed in the U flags, too... hell, i used to list U,UUCP because my system didn't meet the qualifications for listing as an official fidonet to internet gateway so i could not list the UUCP flag on the left of any U flags... listing it as a U flag was quite ok and worked as desired...
)\/(ark --- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux * Origin: SouthEast Star Mail HUB - SESTAR (1:3634/12)
