RS> Multiple drafts were rejected for reasons the author didn't agree RS> with (e.g. draft spec had to be submitted by splitting the text RS> among multiple echomail messages, per stone-age FTSC submission RS> requirements). So he gave up the effort and the FTSC discarded a RS> rare high-quality technical contribution. Or at least, that's my RS> recollection.
i forget the details but the document is on the FTSC table as FSP-1042 since 2019 Mar 26... the previous FSP number was recycled to the SRIF document when the FTSC chairperson at that time decided to no longer reserve document numbers... there is a different chairperson, now... not sure if they are reserving document numbers or not, though...
the presented document has gone through a few edits to correct a few things... one was a table fix and the other was to fix a copy pasta error... aside from that, diff showed minor formatting changes shortening line widths... at this time, the present document is "FSP-1042 Draft 6" as of 2019 Apr 11...
)\/(ark --- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux * Origin: SouthEast Star Mail HUB - SESTAR (1:3634/12)
