= Сообщение: 3550 из 7127 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Björn Felten 2:203/2 16 Dec 17 06:31:54 Кому : Nick Andre 16 Dec 17 06:31:54 Тема : Future Applications FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:203/2+5a34afc6 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:229/426+22F7CEA4 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP437 ================================== Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:154/10+5a35f538 ============================================================================== NA> Let me ask the non-technical people here. You know who you are. Tell me NA> why we even need an FTSC anymore?
I don't regard myself as non-technical, but just the same I want to answer your question.
With the present mandate, the FTSC is totally obsolete.
The way to go is of course to give the FTSC the mandate to decide, not to just document. We could easily collect the hundreds of present documents and turn them all into one standard document.
But our hands are obviously tied. Ergo, hobby programmers all around the world can happily invent all kinds of non-FTN stuff, and then send them in to the FTSC and get the shit documented, if only they have a few nodes (common practice) that are using their crappy software.
..
--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125 * Origin: news://eljaco.se (2:203/2)
