** On Friday 01.01.21 - 12:16, Carol Shenkenberger wrote to Martin Foster:
CS> 1 is a 'no'. There is no tracking on just why something someone CS> proposed, never made standard.
Usually, the why (with examples of usage) is present in the preamble of the proposal. No?
CS> The FTSC doesn't 'reject proposals'. They vote on existing ones that are CS> in use by enough to be a standard.
Ah.. so, should the day arrive when only a minimum of 2 systems exist, then as long as they agree to implement any proposal, that becomes the new standard? :D