Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC с датами от 13 Sep 13 18:57:24 до 15 Nov 24 00:30:01, всего сообщений: 7128
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 6156 из 7128 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC =
От   : Tim Schattkowsky                 2:240/1120.29      24 Feb 22 15:19:05
Кому : Wilfred van Velzen                                  24 Feb 22 15:19:05
Тема : Re^4:  Directly include binary data in messages
FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:240/1120.29+39f4b7a2
На   : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/464+62177b1f
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: UTF-8 ==================================
Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:129/215+d488b614
Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/5003.4+6217a3ea
==============================================================================
//Hello Wilfred,//

on *24.02.2022* at *12:32:20* You wrote in Area *FTSC_PUBLIC*
to *Tim Schattkowsky* about *"Re^3:  Directly include binary data in messages"*.

TS>> It is my belief (in line with some of the points brought up recently),
TS>> that the fidonet infratstucture should be improved (also on the software
TS>> side) to

TS>> - make large messages (in the order of magnitude of up to a few MB) a
TS>> non-issue for most users,

TS>> - enable embedding of images and (small) binary data in messages in a
TS>> compatible way,

TS>> and later on

TS>> - enable private communication between endpoints (i.e., encrypted
TS>> authenticated netmail)

TS>> - maybe support (well-defined?) HTML mail (quite debateable) or the
TS>> like

WvV> This already exists. It's called email. ;)

Fully agree, but that probably wont help fidonet users (other than moving them away). It might make sense to consistently apply exactly these technologies (MIME messages with HTML text, encryption ...) also for fidonet, in particular also for improving echo mail capabilities.

For private messages, there is little sense in competing with email. Surely fidonet netmail is not going to replace email during the next 5 years. However, it makes a lot of sense to provide comparable capabilities just to enable users to make consistent use of netmail and echomail while having basic capabilities that are just not worse than email 20 years ago. Currently thats not remotely the case.
       
Regards,
Tim

--- WinPoint 400.3
* Origin: Original WinPoint Origin! (2:240/1120.29)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.051427 секунды