Thursday March 23 2023 07:35, Ward Dossche wrote to you:
AL>> I have received your challenge to the preliminary results. In AL>> reviewing historical precedent, ...
WD> Historical precedent states that you can only challenge the way how WD> your own ballot was processed, not what happened to someone else's ...
There is no such historical precedent. Ward is making it up for the occasion.
WD> Meaning Michiel's objection ought to be rejected.
Even if it could be demonstrated that such a hypothetical precedence exists and a decision made by the vote coordinator can only be challenged by a voter regarding his/her own vote, then by that same reasoning Ward's challenge is null and void as he is not a voter.