Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC с датами от 13 Sep 13 18:57:24 до 01 Aug 24 00:39:47, всего сообщений: 7127
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 664 из 7127 ======================================= FTSC_PUBLIC =
От   : Henri Derksen                    2:280/1208         29 Nov 13 12:37:00
Кому : Region 18 Coordinator                               29 Nov 13 12:37:00
Тема : Dispute from ZCC.
FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/1208@FidoNet+a68afc0c
На   : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:123/456+5297c20f
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ==================================
Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:123/456+529a34c0
Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:387/22+529a2470
Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:261/1466.0+529ab314
Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:292/854+a4034328
==============================================================================
Hello Ross,

RC> 28 Nov 13 21:23, Bjorn Felten wrote to Scott Little:

BF> Node number 2:203/2 at the present have 87 registered users, and an
BF> unknown unregistered users. Using the node number alone to vote for or
BF> against a specific candidate "Bjerk" is *not* enough to pinpoint the
BF> actual candidate.

Right.

RC> This is a lame viewpoint for even someone belonging to the ftsc..

No not at all.
And I'll show you why, read on.

RC> Host,203,West_Net,Sweden,Bjorn_Felten,46-31-960447,33600,CM,XA,V34,IBN,
RC> INA:felt en.yi.org,U,NEC
RC> ;EX * This segment is copyrighted material, and may not be altered without
RC> ;EX * approval of NC2:203! Any such attempt will be in violation of Swedish
RC> ;EX * law and international agreements.

RC> Can you tell me or show me from the above which is your nodelist segment
RC> where the names of those 87 registered users are? I do see _YOUR_ name!!

Did you notice there is no MO (=Mail Only) flag in his line?
That means there is a BBS too!
A NodeNumber with a BBS means BBS-users with are adressed to as
Point 0 (=Zero), ALL of them!
And of course there are many (un)registered BBS-users.
2:203/2.0 could be any one of that BBS-users (SysOp included).
So a NodeNumber alone does not specify a certain person,
and therefor can not be a valid indicator for a FTSC candidate!
Simple he?

As I am running UniCorn BBS with Users and Points for many decades,
I know what I am talking about. Here are many Point 0 (=Zero) BBSusers too.
Note, they can also write and receive NetMail or EchoMail.

One votes only for or against a candidated human being (FidoNet participant)
as a FTSC member,
and not a nodelisted SysOp, Point or (un-)registerd BBS-user by only a number,
or a false name.

RC> Your claim is as lame as the character set translation thing.

My Point Zero proof shows your RC18 p.o.v. is hereby not valid for a complaint.

IMHO the votes against "Bjerk" are invalid and should still be.
This is not political, but pure technical.
If Bob Seaborn realy wanted to vote against a candidate,
he had to use his normal right (and full) name, as specified by the E.C.
The only one accent letter does not matter, we all understand that.
It is the use of a false name that (not) counts.
The now created result is their voting RC's fault and not from any one else.

Henri.

---
* Origin: Connectivity is the Future; UniCorn BBS 31 26 4425506 (2:280/1208)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.049057 секунды