RS> I still don't understand the original posted question however.
The orginal msg was a test of "Type 2.2 Packet" (FSP-1042 draft 7). The question was answered when it showed up beyond the link it was originally dumped on as a "Type 2.2 Packet" packed MSG which is the same regardless of the Type.
I am calling it a complete success.
Errrrr ... what was the question?
RS> Yes, SBBSecho can both generate and accept the original type 2 RS> packet format.
How about Type 2.2? So far I can only find one that is capable ... besides myself that is.
I like Type 2.2 because it isn't dated. Fidonet has far too many outdated datetime thingies. Seeing one disppear is a breath of fresh air.