Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC с датами от 13 Sep 13 18:57:24 до 15 Nov 24 00:30:01, всего сообщений: 7128
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 5563 из 7128 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC =
От   : Oli                              2:280/464.47       15 Feb 21 11:42:40
Кому : Nick Andre                                          15 Feb 21 11:42:40
Тема : 2021 FTSC Standing Member Election -
FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/464.47+602a5020
На   : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:229/426+C1FFDF07
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: LATIN1 =================================
==============================================================================
Nick wrote (2021-02-12):

NA> On 12 Feb 21  14:50:41, Oli said the following to Nick Andre:

O>> Calling someone a troll is your definition of being polite?

NA> You are a troll who

no, YOU are the troll ... ;)

NA> (A) Started random shit with me quite some time ago
NA> because "you can" and

.... who is living in his own reality distortion field. One of the last times you tried to troll me we weren't even in any discussion nor was my mail about you. But because "you can" you have no problem throwing sexist shit at people out of nowhere:

NA> So what? Are you that insecure about yourself?
NA>
NA> We can find some cranberry juice and Midol for your period, sweetheart.

Everything you accuse others of is exactly the BS you are doing. Should I compile a best of nasty things Nick Andre the troll said?

NA> (B) Tries to take me to task technically but can't.

You rather derail the discussion than engage in the technical details. The "very stable genius" move?

NA> So you invent things to whine about, like this:

O>> (question). Why is the FTSC unable to publish an FTS for the packet
O>> format(s in use for decades? I start to believe that some members of
O>> the FTSC don't even understand the difference between FTS-0001 F.1.
O>> and what's in use today

How is that an invention? See, FSC-0039/45/48 and discussions about FSP-1042.

NA> If you believe the FTSC does not live up to your expectations, then do
NA> something about it and get involved instead of running your mouth. Nobody
NA> is stopping you. ...

That is such an cheap excuse. The FTSC is exactly there for documenting standards in use. Asking people to elect you as an FTSC member and than throwing up your hands telling everyone you're not responsible for anything and rather do nothing than [something worse than nothing] only shows that you are more interested in wearing another hat than in the work the FTSC should be doing.

to be continued ...

---
* Origin: . (2:280/464.47)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.060917 секунды