= Сообщение: 5565 из 7128 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Oli 2:280/464.47 15 Feb 21 12:06:43 Кому : mark lewis 15 Feb 21 12:06:43 Тема : 2021 FTSC Standing Member Election - FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/464.47+602a55c0 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1792.fido-ftscpubl@1:3634/12+248d9961 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: LATIN1 ================================= ============================================================================== mark wrote (2021-02-13):
RS>> I found a flaw in the document a while back, I don't remember the RS>> specifics now, but if I can't review the current draft, how am I RS>> supposed to know if the flaw has been addressed or not?
ml> well, you wouldn't know... hopefully it was found but it is possible it ml> has not yet been discovered... the document is still on the desk... i ml> can't really say more and may have already said too much... i've not yet ml> been reprimanded by any other FTSC members but i'm going to hold off ml> posting more...
This seems a bit of a silly process. 5 years since 2016. Mysterious things are being done behind the scenes. FTSC members don't even know about it or pretend to know nothing about it? Why not use an transparent, public and open process like the IETF and XSF. They are getting things done.
Even a not so perfect and not final proposal(!) for a documentation of Type 2+/.2 packet headers is better than what you can find on today's ftsc.org site.
