MK> Wrong! They were corrupted in Michiels' original posting of the 'hexdump' MK> output. Kees' quote of the 'hexdump' was an accurate recreation although MK> the characters on the right hand side are not latin 1 characters. They MK> are still utf-8 albiet the wrong ones as per the hex codes which still MK> makes Kees' "CHRS: LATIN-1 2" inaccurate despite that it turned out it MK> matches the original posting to a tee.