= Сообщение: 136 из 7128 ======================================= FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Michiel van der Vlist 2:280/5555 07 Nov 13 00:54:18 Кому : Alexey Vissarionov 07 Nov 13 00:54:18 Тема : FSP-1038.001 FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/5555+527ad9e1 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:5020/545+527a1f23 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: UTF-8 ================================== ============================================================================== Hello Alexey,
On Wednesday November 06 2013 14:46, you wrote to me:
MV>> Which will not be possible for many mailers.
AV> Ancient mailers are unable to use IPv6 at all.
Correct.
AV>>> 2. Checking that manually.
MV>> The idea of the nodelist is that mailers can find the required MV>> information without human intervention.
AV> "can find" == "is fresh enough to know about ${subj}" AV> If it can process ${subj}, it can process EAI_ADDRFAMILY as well.
That is where you are wrong. Example: Frontdoor and Intermail allow the user to define flags and allow the mailer to act or not act on them. This statement in FD/IM's route file:
Send-to INO4
Allows FD/IM to send mail via POTS when the other side can not accept incoming calls via IPv4.
Or FD/IM with a telnet/vmodem shim can be stopped from attempting to call nodes not supporting IPv4 and route it via someone else:
Sent-to All except INO4 Route-to 2:280/0 INO4
FD and IM are both abandonware, but they can be made to recognise ${subj}
AV> Once again: that abandonware is not IPv6 capable.
But some abandonware can be made to recognize the INO4 flag.
