On Sunday January 12 2014 16:00, you wrote to Maurice Kinal:
BF> Ergo: I suggest that the FTSC changes the document in question to BF> state that the second, level parameter is obsolete, and if present BF> should be ignored.
That /is/ more or less what FTS-5003.001 says
Some implementations do not add the <level> field and some implementations erroneously present "UTF-8 2" instead of "UTF-8 4". Well mannered implementations should gracefully handle this situation when reading messages. The recommended way of doing this is to ignore the level parameter and only use the name of the identifier. In future the level parameter may become obsolete.
