Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.

	Введите FGHI ссылку: Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC с датами от 13 Sep 13 18:57:24 до 15 Nov 24 00:30:01, всего сообщений: 7128 Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение = Сообщение: 1234 из 7128 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От   : Michiel van der Vlist            2:280/5555         03 Oct 14 12:28:41 Кому : Markus Reschke                                      03 Oct 14 12:28:41 Тема : FTSC-5001 question FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/5555+542e7bda На   : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:240/1661+54280295 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP850 ================================== Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:3634/12.0+42ec7ac0 Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=3:770/1+45445c26 ============================================================================== Hello Markus, On Friday October 03 2014 10:51, you wrote to Paul Hayton: PH>> At present my nodelist entry uses IBN:agency.bbs.geek.nz to PH>> achieve the same kind of outcome it would seem. MR> Yes, but the recommended method is: MR> ...,IBN,INA:agency.bbs.geek.nz,... Not really. If there is only one protocol flag, not using the INA flag is shorter and therefore recommended. The INA flag was proposed to avoid having to repeat the host name for each protocol flag when more than one is present. In the past it caused propblems with lines that were too long for the old MakeNl. Other than that, in the orignal proposal, the INA flag had to be listed before the protocol flags. That is easier on the parsers. Too many nodelist clerk's ignoed that, so it was not copied into the standard. Cheers, Michiel --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20130111 * Origin: http://www.vlist.org (2:280/5555) К главной странице гейта

Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.055891 секунды