On Monday January 25 2016 23:23, you wrote to Wilfred van Velzen:
WvV>> So I think the FTSC documentation might be wrong. Maybe it WvV>> shouldn't even mention the .try file, because it's not part of WvV>> BSO, and only a binkd "internal" status file.
BF> After having read Pavel's comment I concur. The FTSC documentation BF> should not mention those private files at all.
They already ARE mentioned. The djinn is out of the bottle...
They should at least be mentioned as "reserved", to prevent that someone else will start using them in a way incompatible with current use.