O> .... and it is misleading. This is what FTS-5001 defines:
I'm pretty certain there are a number of things in the definitions which are the private agenda of individuals without it being the general usage needing to be defined.
A while ago I did the count of listed sysops, which does not mean 'active' sysops and that count was a disappointment.
Because of these low counts I wonder what the added value is for the community whether or not something is represented in one way or the other way.
The fact is the critical mass of Fidonet has crashed a long time ago, there is no current technology which is going to signify a sudden rebounding of the network ... it's a polite way of saying that most such discussions are at the level of comparing penises.
\%/@rd
--- DB4 - August 7 2020 * Origin: Black Olives Matter (2:292/854)
