>> hehehe... it doesn't and never has... that's one of the reasons i've >> appeared to be ""against"" binkd's usage in FTNs... it is a raw mailer >> and provides nothing else for most standard FTN operations... SH> To be fair, if we actually followed policy 4 and *required* FTS-0001 SH> during ZMH, most of Fidonet would dissapear.
If you'd read it more carefully, you can notice "using the protocol defined in the _current_ FidoNet Technical Standards Committee publication" words there. Now look into http://ftsc.org/docs/fts-1026.001 - it says:
"This document is a Fidonet Technical Standard (FTS)"