Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC с датами от 13 Sep 13 18:57:24 до 01 Apr 24 01:17:44, всего сообщений: 7124
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 1990 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC =
От   : Alexey Vissarionov               2:5020/545         03 Mar 16 09:00:00
Кому : mark lewis                                          03 Mar 16 09:00:00
Тема : FSP-1040.001 draft 0
FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:5020/545+56d7e0dd
На   : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:3634/12.73+56d6fece
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ==================================
Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=95.fido-ftscpubl@1:103/1+1b3d30dd
Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:3634/12.73+56d8f07d
==============================================================================
Good ${greeting_time}, mark!

02 Mar 2016 09:50:46, you wrote to me:

>>>> However, almost all message editors comply to it, so that's
>>>> common practice.
SH>>> Maybe if you only include message editors specifically written
SH>>> for FidoNet rather than all message editors.
AV>> Obviously, yes: all other message editors are out-of-scope here.
ml> really? what about all the new *nix based systems that use nano
ml> or vi

They are generic text editors, not message editors.

ml> or even emacs

Really? They finally created a text editor for it?

ml> for their users' message editor?

The use of a text editor to compose messages (like I do with vim) doesn't make that text editor a message editor.

ml> at least they can write and display UTF-8...

Never used that until beginning to learn Chinese...

ml> which is more important?

Whether the msged will support UTF-8, would you use it?
What if it will be a Linux-only fork?

>>>> Moreover, people with incompliant editors may be banned from some
>>>> echoareas.
SH>>> Sounds like areas that aren't worth posting in anyway if they'll
SH>>> be happy to punish users for decisions their sysops make.
AV>> In practice, those users simply move to points.
ml> not over here they don't... they never have... they live with the
         ^^^^^^^^^
ml> situation OR they find another BBS OR both... in some cases, they
ml> might be able to get their sysop to find a new and better editor
ml> for them to use but that won't help at all if the BBS doesn't place
ml> the quotes in the temporary message file properly...

I guess your "over here" means Z1... well, the users' choice is not as wide as it's in Z2 (and especially in R50) - the whole Z1 lists only 316 unique sysop names (some of them are listed 6 times, like you, or even 9 times, like Kurt Weiske or RJ Clay), including obviously special names like "New_Sysop" (9), "new_sysop" (4), "New_Fido_SysOp" (4), "UUCP" (2), "New_SysOp" (2).

However, the whole Fidonet is almost 6 times larger (1887 unique names), so here's much more options.


--
Alexey V. Vissarionov aka Gremlin from Kremlin
gremlin.ru!gremlin; +vii-cmiii-cmlxxvii-mmxlviii

... god@universe:~ # cvs up && make world
--- /bin/vi
* Origin: http://openwall.com/Owl (2:5020/545)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.038909 секунды