DC> Could you please provide a brief summary of each of these folks' DC> Fidonet software development contributions? I ask that because DC> based on #5's raging hard-on for that qualification in others, it DC> seems only fair to "vett" them all by that standard, right?
AV> I can provide that myself. The primary answer is HPT (and the AV> Husky project in whole), others are binkd and golded.
AV> However, I've resigned FTSC (didn't go for the next term once the AV> previous had expired) and don't see any reasons to return - at AV> least until it will become T again.
Okay, it certainly seems that you meet the "qualification" of having developed some FTN software. My biggest point in my question to Bjorn was that most (all?) of the other candidates on his "wishlist" would *NOT* meet that qualification, which seems silly in the first place. Why would documenting standards and practices in FidoNet require programming skills? This insistence on such a qualification seems to come largely from.... you.
