AL> I have received your challenge to the preliminary results. In reviewing AL> historical precedent, ...
WD> Historical precedent states that you can only challenge the way WD> how your own ballot was processed, not what happened to someone WD> else's ...
What historical precedent states that? Specifics, please, such as date/subject/names. Where do you see such a precedent?
WD> Meaning Michiel's objection ought to be rejected.
Well, that's your opinion, anyway. The official election coordinator doesn't agree with it, which is all that matters.
As an aside, can you name another election (of any kind) where a person can go back and change their vote after it's been cast?
... So easy, a child could do it. Child sold separately. === MultiMail/Linux v0.52 --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)
